Author |
Message |
jeep200 #1 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the other fields. Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:38:28 GMT |
|
 |
Paul B #2 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
In the properties of the fields you don't want the user to edit, changed 'LOCKED' to yes. You can also change 'TAB STOP' to no so if they tab around it won't stop it the field. HTH. Quote:
> I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform > displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am > building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a > yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the > other fields. > Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:05:02 GMT |
|
 |
Klatu #3 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Create a form to use instead of the table. Base the form on the table. Make its default view datasheet view. Make all the controls Locked property on the form = Yes except for the check box. Change the source object on you main form from the table to the new form. Quote:
> I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform > displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am > building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a > yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the > other fields. > Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:06:02 GMT |
|
 |
jeep2001 via AccessMonster.co #4 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Thank you. It sounds like the right way to go. I''ll tryit in the morning. Ahank you Quote:
>Create a form to use instead of the table. Base the form on the table. Make >its default view datasheet view. Make all the controls Locked property on >the form = Yes except for the check box. Change the source object on you >main form from the table to the new form. >> I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform >> displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am >> building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a >> yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the >> other fields. >> Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx
-- Message posted via AccessMonster.com http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-formscoding/200604/1
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:36:42 GMT |
|
 |
John Vinso #5 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Quote:
>I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform >displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am >building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a >yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the >other fields. >Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx
Depends on how determined the users are, but yes: you can set a control's Enabled property to No, and its Locked property to Yes, in order that the user can only look but not touch. This doesn't stop the user from opening the Table or a Query directly - you'll need to implement Access security to do that. John W. Vinson[MVP]
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:03:08 GMT |
|
 |
Klatu #6 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
I ususally use Locked instead of Disabled for visual purposes. Disabled is good if you want to make it apparent to the user the control is unavailable. In any case, you don't need to use both. Quote:
> >I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform > >displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am > >building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a > >yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the > >other fields. > >Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx > Depends on how determined the users are, but yes: you can set a > control's Enabled property to No, and its Locked property to Yes, in > order that the user can only look but not touch. > This doesn't stop the user from opening the Table or a Query directly > - you'll need to implement Access security to do that. > John W. Vinson[MVP]
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:07:03 GMT |
|
 |
TC #7 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Quote:
> I ususally use Locked instead of Disabled for visual purposes. Disabled is > good if you want to make it apparent to the user the control is unavailable. > In any case, you don't need to use both.
The two together do make sense in appropriate cases: Locked - field looks normal, accepts the cursor, but can't be edited; Disabled - field looks disabled, won't accept the cursor, and can't be edited; Locked /and/ Disabled - field looks normal, won't accept the cursor, and can't be edited. Cheers, TC (MVP Access) http://tc2.atspace.com
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:16:55 GMT |
|
 |
Klatu #8 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Thanks, TC, I'll give that a test. I have been under the impression that anytime you use Disabled, it looked disabled. Can't remember that I have tried the two together. This could be very useful. Quote:
> > I ususally use Locked instead of Disabled for visual purposes. Disabled is > > good if you want to make it apparent to the user the control is unavailable. > > In any case, you don't need to use both. > The two together do make sense in appropriate cases: > Locked - field looks normal, accepts the cursor, but can't be edited; > Disabled - field looks disabled, won't accept the cursor, and can't be > edited; > Locked /and/ Disabled - field looks normal, won't accept the cursor, > and can't be edited. > Cheers, > TC (MVP Access) > http://tc2.atspace.com
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:26:02 GMT |
|
 |
TC #9 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Say you enter a ProjectID on a form, and the form replies with the corresponding project name: Project ID: [123 ] ( The Big Blah Project ) Normally you would not want the project name to be editable here. So you would set that textbox control to Locked. However, the user can still move the cursor into that control. Then the cursor changes to a vertical bar. So the user thinks, "WTF is going on there?". So: o Locked (alone) is not enough - see above; o Disabled produces a visual effect that you would probably *not want* here, but o Locked + Disabled does the job nicely. Cheers, TC (MVP Access) http://tc2.atspace.com
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:42:56 GMT |
|
 |
Klatu #10 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
Thanks, again. I got the concept from your previous post. Quote:
> Say you enter a ProjectID on a form, and the form replies with the > corresponding project name: > Project ID: > [123 ] ( The Big Blah Project ) > Normally you would not want the project name to be editable here. So > you would set that textbox control to Locked. However, the user can > still move the cursor into that control. Then the cursor changes to a > vertical bar. So the user thinks, "WTF is going on there?". > So: > o Locked (alone) is not enough - see above; > o Disabled produces a visual effect that you would probably *not > want* here, but > o Locked + Disabled does the job nicely. > Cheers, > TC (MVP Access) > http://tc2.atspace.com
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:50:02 GMT |
|
 |
jeep2001 via AccessMonster.co #11 / 15
|
 Is it possible to allow/not allow editing to certain fields in a subform
It worked perfectly. Thank you so much. Quote:
>Create a form to use instead of the table. Base the form on the table. Make >its default view datasheet view. Make all the controls Locked property on >the form = Yes except for the check box. Change the source object on you >main form from the table to the new form. >> I have a subform which has a table as its source object. This subform >> displays its data in data grid not text fields on a form. The manager I am >> building this app for has requested that her users be able to only check a >> yes/no field on the subform, and not have the ability to change any of the >> other fields. >> Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanx
-- Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com
|
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:25:22 GMT |
|
|